Talk:Temporal resolution

Untitled

This reference http://webvision.med.utah.edu/temporal.html can be used when expanding the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.122.121.177 (talk) 16:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Reference to Brief History of Time

What teaser? Certainly Newton expected gravity to propogate at infinite velocity, indeed the term 'propogation' is meaningless in the Newtonian context. But how is that relevant today? I've just re-read Brief History and can find nothing to support this statement. Bluntly, I think this whole paragraph is nonsense. Pawprintoz (talk) 01:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

I agree, it reads as nonsense to me as well. I have read the Brief History of Time and I don't recall anything like this from its pages. I don't have a copy to check from, but if someone wants to put this back, please add a full citation with edition and page numbers. jni ^(delete)_{just not interested} 19:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

This article is dreadful. For one thing much of it confuses resolution with sampling interval. The part about the speed of light and a trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution seems plain wrong to me; in the classical regime you can compensate for delay and in the quantum regime the trade-off is between energy and temporal resolution. The only thing that's correct is the basic definition of the term. 94.195.197.112 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Temporal resolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120605152114/http://aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/ara/arc/cp/0747.pdf to http://aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/ara/arc/cp/0747.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)