Talk:Temporalis muscle

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Requested move 27 September 2021

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 January 2022 and 11 March 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kyyylove (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Shalibalba, Robinkucr.

Temporal Line

edit

From reading a variety of anatomy text books, they have all confirmed that the temporalis muscle actually connects to the temporal lines on the parietal bone, not simply the temporal bone. Is this correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.126.215 (talkcontribs) 00:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Factual error

edit

Another page on wikipedia states that the masseter muscle is the most powerful muscle in the human body - however, here it states that temporalis is the most powerful - I would say the latter is incorrect. (Author unknown.)

(This on behalf of another editor who placed comment on article page. I don't have an opinion, so not necessary to comment to me on this, thanks.) Piano non troppo (talk) 07:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 September 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


Temporal muscleTemporalis muscleGoogle Ngrams shows that the term "temporalis" is far more popular than "temporal" when describing this muscle. It is also becoming more common over time. The main article "Temporal muscle" currently receives around 3,300 views per month, whilst the redirect "Temporalis muscle" receives around 200 and the redirect "Temporalis" receives 250 (combined around 15% of the total).

Whilst this move would be fairly minor (especially considering the fairly minimal use of redirects at the moment), it would be consistent with the most common name for the subject in the scientific literature. Bibeyjj (talk) 15:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Bibeyjj (talk) 15:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.