Talk:Tennessee Walking Horse/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by PumpkinSky in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PumpkinSky (talk · contribs) 19:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a This: "single curb bit with a bit shank under 9-1/2 inches" doesn't use a convert template but the other measurements do. 
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
     
  5. It is stable.
     
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a This image: File:Hambletonian10.jpg, needs a parameter for its PD-Art tag
      images okay now.
  7. Overall:
    1) I don't know about other screens, but on mine the Footnotes section header is kicked almost halfway across the screen because of the grooming photo. 1) some of the PDF refs have |format=PDF and some don't. PumpkinSky talk 20:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail: