Talk:Terlingua, Texas

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Ghost towns Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ghost towns on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ghost townsWikipedia:WikiProject Ghost townsTemplate:WikiProject Ghost townsGhost town articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cycling: Mountain Biking

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mountain Biking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Rename necessary?

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm not sure why the recent rename was done -- there's not more than one Terlingua, is there? We don't ordinarily use the format Terlingua (Ghost Town) except to disambiguate. --Pete Tillman (talk) 04:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree. the tag "(Ghost Town)" is pointless. Plazak (talk) 21:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Needs to be re-rated - Excellent depth of coverage

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was once rated "start-class" -- but clearly it has gone far beyond that. In fact, for such a minor, obscure location, this is a fantastic amount of detail, well-presented. Kudos to all.

~ Penlite (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic