Talk:Terra Nova: Strike Force Centauri/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by JimmyBlackwing in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Subzerosmokerain (talk) 19:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Very well done, perfect flow had no trouble reading the article.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    You didn't finish referencing the Story sub-section. While I don't think it is entirely necessary, it would help to reference it like the rest of the story section and help point out at which point they happened in the game.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    No real issues, some sections look smaller than others but that just seems to be some sections go with games like this.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    I was a bit wary on passing this part as there is considerable negative reception covered on the game's graphical issues but it seems equalized by its praise on the other parts of the game.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):   It isn't exactly the captions but rather the Alt text parameter which appears to be missing for all the images in this article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    The references and the alt text are the only things keeping this from becoming GA status, once those are fixed it'll be there.