Talk:Terry Byrne
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Smartse in topic Deleted content restored
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Terry Byrne be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Ttonyb1 (talk · contribs) on 11 August 2010 with the comment: WP:BLPPROD It was contested by ShesNumber17 (talk · contribs) on 2010-08-12 |
 | A fact from Terry Byrne appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 August 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deleted content restored
editThis article was created by User:ShesNumber17 (talk), and was essentially a curriculum vitae. User:Ttonyb1 and I then formatted it as an article and expanded it with citations, following Wikipedia's policies WP:V etc. The article's creator then came along and deleted the content that others had added, leaving no explanation in the edit summaries. I have therefore reverted the article to its fullest version. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- They've done it again, and I've reverted. It would look to be a bit of a classic conflict of interest case in my opinion - first an autobiography, then removal of well sourced, but slightly negative material. I'll keep an eye on it. Smartse (talk) 14:50, 30 August 2010 (UTC)