 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Summarise TestU01 results?
editThis article should be revised to summarise the results of TestU01 when applied to different PRNGs.
Perhaps a tabular summary of results and failures would be good? Suggestion for columns something like this? :
1.PRNG-name (and link wikipedia page) | 2.provisos, initialisations to avoid, etc. | 3. success or failure(s) (with some detail, but not too much detail as this might be better on the individual wikipedia PRNG-pages) | — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwikip (talk • contribs) 21:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- As an alternative, the above information might be summarised in the List_of_random_number_generators - but I maintain my intial the suggestion that individual results should be in the individual PRNG pages. jw (talk) 16:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- In 4+ months, not one person has reacted to my suggestion!!?? Fellow wikipedians, please react ! jw (talk) 16:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
README file or encyclopedia article?
editThis article, and especially the history section, reads like the README for a software package. Could need some copy editing... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:10C9:1005:A800:1FF:FE00:59D9 (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)