Talk:Tetrahedron Computer Methodology
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Egon Willighagen in topic Arguments for keeping this article
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Arguments for keeping this article
edit- the journal performed a unique experiment: sharing of scientific code. This was before the Internet, and peer review of source code is still rarely done.
- in the three years of existence the journals published a few highly influential articles, like the one on CORINA (still the de facto standard for creating 3D structures)
I will search and add missing independent sources ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egon Willighagen (talk • contribs) 10:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)