Talk:Tetrasomy X/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by JackFromReedsburg in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello I will be reviewing this article. As usual, comments will be made soon. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

General comments

edit
  • All claims are cited
  • All images are sourced properly
  • It would be better if this article had more images, but the ones currently are minimally sufficient for GA.
  • Earwig copyvio report came back clean.
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·