Talk:Texas Recreational Road 9

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dom497 in topic GA Review
Former good articleTexas Recreational Road 9 was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2012Good article nomineeListed
February 19, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Texas Recreational Road 9/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 14:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    No images used.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    No images used.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit

Nothing needs to be fixed. And just as a side note, images are not required for GA.--Dom497 (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply