Talk:Texas Triangle

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

San Antonio

edit

There should be a picture of San Antonio on here too. San Antonio has a larger population than Austin and Dallas. -Kylelovesyou (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're right, but

edit

Dallas itself only has 1.2 million people, less than San Antonio at 1.35. But the Dallas metro area has about 6.6 million, while the San Antonio metro area is about 1/3 of that. Marzolian (talk) 23:43, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

You're both right, but SA should be included

edit

However you cut it, San Antonio is larger than Austin (both in terms of metro and city population), and is one of the cities that forms the actual "triangle". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.119.153.84 (talk) 19:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Population figures

edit

The population given is confusing and something is probably wrong. One place says: "The Texas Triangle ... and is home to more than 70% of all Texans (pop 13.8 million)." Later it says: "... region contains ... 17 million people, nearly 75 percent of Texas' total population." Marzolian (talk) 23:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Beaumont-Port Arthur MSA

edit

The article currently says "Sometimes, Beaumont, located east of Houston, has been considered part of the Texas Triangle." Edited the article to be a little stronger based on the following. Every governmental study or university paper I have reviewed so far includes the Beaumont-Port Arthur area in the Texas Triangle. If there is something stronger that moves the boundary one county to the west, then I would support changing the wording back. I just haven't found any.

1. The Southeast Texas Regional Planning Commission is one of eleven regional councils or councils of government in the Texas Triangles Councils of Governments. [1]
2. The area is also included in another 2009 study by the University of Texas.[2]
3. Another study in 2011 listed The Port of Beaumont as one of four major ports in the Texas Triangle.[3]
4. The Beaumont area is also mentioned in another government funded study[4] 5. The area is also depicted in a 2007 study linked to the US Department of Transportation titled Megaregions and Multi-Jurisdictional Planning.[5]
LUSportsFan (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "MegaRegions +MetroProsperity". Houston Tomorrow and America 2050. August 4, 2009. Retrieved November 8, 2014.
  2. ^ Kent Butler, Sara Hammerschmidt, Frederick Steiner and Ming Zhang. "REINVENTING THE TEXAS TRIANGLE Solutions for Growing Challenges" (PDF). The University of Texas at Austin School of Architecture Center for Sustainable Development. pp. 6, 10. Retrieved November 8, 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Dan Seedah and Robert Harrison (September 2011). "Megaregion Freight Movements: A Case Study of the Texas Triangle" (PDF). Center for Transportation Research University of Texas at Austin (Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)). pp. 37–38. Retrieved November 8, 2014.
  4. ^ Michael Neuman and Elise Bright (May 2008). "TEXAS URBAN TRIANGLE Framework for future growth" (PDF). Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135. pp. 4–6. Retrieved November 8, 2014.
  5. ^ Ming Zhang, Frederick Steiner, Kent Butler (April 4, 2007). "Connecting the Texas Triangle: Economic Integration and Transportation Coordination" (PDF). The Healdsburg Research Seminar on MegaRegions. p. 31. Retrieved November 8, 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Texaplex merged

edit

I have merged Texaplexs' content into Texas Triangle per a merger proposed in Nov. 2011. Texaplex now redirects to Texas Triangle. 220 of Borg 02:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Texas Triangle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:19, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply