Talk:Texas rat snake

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Texas rat snake is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pantherophis

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Shouldn't this snake be classified as Pantherophis rather than Elaphe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.17.174.227 (talk) 00:34, 4 June 2015‎ (UTC)Reply

According to the article, the ICZN rejected the proposed reclassification. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article title name

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The title of this article is the scientific classification. Usually, but not all the time, there has been no contest in changing to the more common name since policy and consensus has shown (including examples shown in the policy) this acceptable. There has been times when this is contested so I am posting intentions to rename (or seek through RM if contested) the title to the far more common Texas rat snake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otr500 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 19 July 2015‎ (UTC)Reply

Requested move 29 August 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed. Jenks24 (talk) 16:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Elaphe obsoleta lindheimeri → Texas rat snake – WP:COMMONNAME / WP:NCFAUNA; no objection made after intent to move expressed on Talk page more than a month ago. – —BarrelProof (talk) 23:45, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

@BarrelProof: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Anthony Appleyard: What's the issue? I don't see any real potential for controversy here. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

@BarrelProof: I have seen many disputes about whether to use scientific name or common name for some organism. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
OK. Thanks for the explanation. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic