The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
One problem with the Wikipedia treatment of Texas v Penn is that it is hard to get at exactly what "changing election procedures" Texas objected to. Other articles are referenced, but even when going to those articles, it is hard to really see exactly what the "changing election procedures" were. In the case of Pennsylvania, I believe that Texas claimed that allowing mail-in ballots received up till three days after the election should have been done by the Pennsylvania legislature, not the Pennsylvania executive branch. The Penn supreme court disagreed, saying that the state executive action was a reasonable accommodation to the Covid pandemic. But it is really hard to use Wikipedia to get at this kind of information. Ideally, I think it should be summarized in this article. This would apply to all four states: Penn, Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin. --Westwind273 (talk) 18:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
