Talk:Thank You, Happy Birthday
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Review Voice
editPlease review the updated article and, if you feel it is an improvement, remove the "cleanup" and "neutrality" tags at the top of the page. Changes have been made to fix those problems. Shomukherjeet2 (talk) 04:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
'I did my best to fix the Recording and Production section, changing it completely and adding quotes with inline citations for most declarative statements. I also tried to edit it until it was relevant to the subject matter. Shomukherjeet2 (talk) 21:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
This article uses a lot of quotes and information regarding the band's activities between this album and their previous but doesn't cite any of the information. The article should be rewritten to avoid the perspective that it appears to be written from now, one which appears very biased towards the band due to lack of citations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.70.66.248 (talk) 21:48, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
This article sounds more like an album review. Language like "Super catchy anthem" should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kubrickan (talk • contribs) 19:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
This entire article is copy-pasted from Amazon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.76.195.230 (talk) 21:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for notifying us of this copyright issue. I have reverted the article to a non-infringing version. Logan Talk Contributions 21:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The article still feels a lot like a magazine review with a lot of personal opinions and takes brought into it. I'm in the process of revamping/cutting down the "Recording and Production" section. If anyone has any reference they would like to contribute to support some of the claims in this section, please by all means add them. ckolar612 —Preceding undated comment added 04:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC).
I reverted back to the old Recording and Production. The new one was clearly biased and sounded like an advertisement. The current (old) one is much more direct and informative.ckolar612 —Preceding undated comment added 05:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC).
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cagetheelephant.com/?pagename=Bio. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 21:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC)