| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tags
editNemesisman, you have been consistently removing warning tags here and at MY Nemesis. It is not appropriate for an editor to remove tags from articles without attempting to address the issues that they raise.
The most urgent problem here is that the article does not cite any sources. That it reads like an advertisement for your friend (or, more likely, your employer) Mr Papalexis is of lesser concern. However, articles that do not cite reliable sources are highly likely to be viewed skeptically by others as they are simply not encyclopedic. I would not be at all surprised to see such an article nominated for deletion, so my advice is to make this article better, not just delete tags. Many thanks, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 06:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Searches
editFind sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Removal of unsourced material
editIn line with WP:BLP, which states that "Material about living persons must be sourced very carefully. Without reliable third-party sources, it will violate the No original research and Verifiability policies", I have removed all of the unsourced material from this article. Let's now expand the article using reliable, sourced material to do so. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 08:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
It
editIt is odd that one cigarette stub had the DNA of three men on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.148.103.3 (talk) 13:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)