Talk:thatPower

Page Name

Should it not be moved to That Power? #thatPower is just a stylisation! — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:40, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and is it #thatPower or #thatPOWER? Helicopter Llama 16:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

It also says "The correct title of this article is #thatPower. The substitution or omission of the # is because of technical restrictions." Yet, since it's just for stylization reasons, the correct title of the article is what it is now and there should be no need for the hatnote. Shouldn't it be like other articles that use stylization in the name, and the first sentence written as "ThatPower" (stylized as #thatPower)? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 04:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. There is no ban of stylization on Wikipedia as long as it's not too extreme (like for example entirely in Chinese characters or something like that). So we don't need to be nitpicky and create problem where there is none. The overzealous style policemen have no grounds to stand on anyway as they always have shoddy double-standards (you don't see them dare go to the Apple handset page and edit "I phone, stylized as iPhone". Loginnigol (talk) 10:27, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Starcheers doesn't say anything about banning stylization. He/she says that the inclusion of the "#" isn't required. Allow me to explain why the inclusion of # is different to the inclusion of a letter. # stands for one of two things, its a symbolic representation of the word "number" or it is a social media mechanism "hash-tagging" most prominently used on twitter. If the name of the song was read and sung as "hashtag that power" but was written as "#thatPower" then including the "#" is detrimental to the name. However, the name of the song as per what's song and said outloud is "that power". Therefore the inclusion of the "#" is for the social media mechanism rather than to represent the word "number". As a result, the reason to include the "#" is stylistic, i.e. its a stylistic choice for the copyright (the copyright being legally registering the song is a recorded work), but it is not pronounced in the work nor is it part of the title. the inclusion of "i" in "iphone" is not stylistic, it is part of the copyright and part of the name, thus including the i is detrimental to the work in question as a phone and an iphone are two different things whereas #thatpower and thatpower are one in the same, as in this context the "#" has no meaning. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 19:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Even with the proposal changing later in the move proposal, the move was still opposed by consensus. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 03:34, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

---

ThatPower → That Power – There is difference in media and references as to how the song is named. Variations include #thatPower, #thatPOWER, #ThatPower, #thatpower and so on. The cover-art says #THATPOWER and the choice to include a # is purely stylistic in the same way that Kesha chooses to write her name as Ke$ha. "That Power" is two words. see Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Article titles for the MoS on this. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

• Support MOS:TM -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose, no other song is called "That Power"...  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 20:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

comment, fixed, it should read move ThatPower to That Power. the choice of no space is stylistic. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 21:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Support per nom.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:57, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

• Support new name suggestion per the MOSTM. Please note that the oppose comment was made when the proposal was originally to move the article to That Power (will.i.am song). That has since been changed so that should no longer be an issue.--64.229.164.74 (talk) 01:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks allows CamelCase, and SeaMonkey is an example used in Wikipedia:Article titles. As "That Power" and "ThatPower" are equally acceptable titles and both are used, official title and common name should determine which of the two we should use. Peter James (talk) 00:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

That is indeed true. On second though, I have to oppose, for the above reasons. Zach 03:41, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Oppose I really don't see the point in adding a space and "(will.i.am song)" to the title. If anything, we should move it to thatPOWER, but that is just a stylization. On iTunes, the song is titled "#thatPOWER," and hence it should stay here72.74.136.49 (talk) 20:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose there does not appear to be any precedent to change the title, nothing overwhelming to suggest that the space will be an improvement and will likely decrease searchability. Agree also per Peter James above. Tiggerjay (talk) 20:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose Camel case is generally a frivolous style choice, but it's one of the few that we actually recognize around here. --BDD (talk) 23:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Genre

No information within the article mentions the genre nor does does the genre additions themselves have citations. This is why they were removed. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation

The name is shared by the last track in Childish Gambino's Camp (album) album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marp (talk • contribs) 04:32, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on ThatPower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.recordreport.com.ve/publico/?i=poprock
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129043504/http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=20130001 to http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=20130001
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130602195200/http://fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/playlist/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

hi, i fixed the infobox. do not revert the edit. Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 13:30, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 25 April 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved, closing the discussion five days early per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure). D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 01:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

---

ThatPower → thatPOWER – "Power" is all uppercase in the song's title. 2601:584:180:3D80:A127:41F0:C66E:3BDC (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose per MOS:TM: Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization practices, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official". —El Millo (talk) 02:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
• oppose per El Millo, also move to 'Thatpower'—blindlynx (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose per MOS:TM In ictu oculi (talk) 17:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose per MOS:TM MOS:ALLCAPS, the current title is as correct for WP as it can get. Lazz_R 20:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.