Talk:TheGATE.ca

Canada: Television / Music / Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hangon rationale

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I'm still gathering information to fill out this piece. I would suggest this website is as interesting and notable as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PunkTV.ca, and is an example of one of Canada's few active independent publishers. I can update this record in the coming week for further review, if this explanation is acceptable.

Quickly combing through a few verifiable facts, which I can add once I have more detail, this site is one of Canada's older online magazines, has interviewed notable celebrities and cultural icons, and has contributions from notable writers. Dustyweasel (talk) 04:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Additionally I have added syndication details for two columns that are republished elsewhere. Dustyweasel (talk) 04:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You need to ensure that the article complies with WP:CORP criteria for inclusion. Currently it does not. This article really should have been created as a sub-page in your userspace and improved upon there before moving it to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've declined the speedy deletion, but more third-party sourcing is needed to help to demonstrate WP:N notability. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic