Talk:The 120 Days of Sodom
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The 120 Days of Sodom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Reception and Themes and Analysis
editHello all
I have replaced the Assessments section with two sections: Reception, and Themes and analysis. I have focussed more on published critical analysis of the actual novel rather than general analysis on Sade.
Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Plot and Chronology
editHello all
I have combined the Plot and Chronology sections because in this novel the chronology is pretty much the plot. I have corrected some errors and have summarised some overly detailed information. I have removed unsourced editorial comment and added some information with sources.
Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Characters
editHello all
I have corrected some errors, summarised some excessive detail and removed some unsourced editorial comment.
Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- There is a misattributed quotation: the paraphrase He would love to destroy the sun or use a star to burn the world, attributed to the Duc de Blangis, actually originates with the Président de Curval, in the penultimate paragraph of the Eighth Day.
- Nuttyskin (talk) 02:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Change made. Thanks for pointing that out. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:49, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Manuscript history
editHello all
I have changed the title from History to "Manuscript History" because it is the history of the manuscript rather than the novel per se. I have removed some repeated information and written the rest more concisely. I have added some detail to make the story more comprehensible.
Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Lead
editHello all
I have re-written the lead to reflect the new information in the article. I have corrected some information and removed some unsourced information. I have also removed multiple references to information which isn't controversial and is fully referenced in the article.
Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)