Talk:The 5 Mrs. Buchanans

Vivian's Kid's Names

What are the names of her kids. One is PJ but I can't figure out the other kid's name? 66.99.2.162 (talk) 17:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)eric

I believe they were Lyndon and P.J. — TAnthony^Talk 18:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The logo screencap clearly establishes the use of the numeral in the title; this article appears to have been incorrectly cut-and-paste moved to this incorrect title in its early stages.— TAnthony^Talk 18:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

• Oppose. However you choose to write it in a title, roman numerals, arabic, 5 is still spelled "five". McGoogle has 1,830 English pages for "The 5 Mrs. Buchanans", and 2,650 English pages for "The Five Mrs. Buchanans". 199.125.109.102 (talk) 19:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I believe by Wikipedia convention we follow the style of the work, as in Numb3rs and Vega$. By design the redirect would take care of any alternate searches, and we're not talking about a name variation that violates WP:COMMONNAME.— TAnthony^Talk 19:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

• Support. That's how they write it, and that's how an interested reader searching for this article is most likely to write it. Jafeluv (talk) 11:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Google shows otherwise. See above. 199.125.109.102 (talk) 04:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

The difference in hits is not that big; the point is, a redirect takes care of it either way, the article name should reflect the "real" presentation established by the series itself. And as I've noted above, there is Wikipedia precedent for that.— TAnthony^Talk 05:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

• Question: What about this image? It seems to contradict what the proposer states. Parsecboy (talk) 22:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

• Interestingly enough, it's still showing up in Google in the Wikimedia upload file. Parsecboy (talk) 22:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, the origins of that image (previously in the article) are unclear, but the current one is a screencap from an actual episode (and all episodes match, take a look at YouTube ...) — TAnthony^Talk 02:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I accept the arguments in favour of the move and have made it so. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)