Talk:The Adults Are Talking
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Adults Are Talking article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from The Adults Are Talking appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Strokes lose a game of baseball by a score of 56–1 against a team of robots in the music video for their song "The Adults Are Talking"? Source: Rolling Stone — "The Strokes aim for a moral victory in an impossible game of baseball against superior robot opponents in the new video for 'The Adults Are Talking.' ... While Casablancas beats the throw to the plate and scores, a quick cut to the scoreboard reveals the tally is 56 to one in favor of the robots. Nevertheless, the Strokes treat their consolation run as a championship win and celebrate accordingly."
- Reviewed: David S. Breslow
Converted from a redirect by Aria1561 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC).
Fun hook. Article is good for date and length, and pulls together diverse information from a lot of sources, all of which are well cited. Clean report from Earwig, and QPQ has been done. Jheald (talk) 21:09, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
