Talk:The Age of Plastic/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Вик Ретлхед (talk · contribs) 07:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

With all the issues address, here's the summary of your work:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The prose was fixed and I believe it is satisfactory in its current state.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The references are placed in appropriate templates and are citing reliable sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The text covers all major aspects and doesn't contain trivia.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   All of the information is fairly presented.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The two covers used in the article are properly licensed. Additional images would be unnecessary.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Well, after a few suggestion of mine which you successfully completed, I'm happy to announce that this article is upgraded to GA.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.