Talk:The Allen Group
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Allen Group article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Speedy delete
editI added the g11 speedy to this article because it appears to be little more than promotional material for the company. Regarding notablity, the article states that it has notable clients, but does not say how the company itself is notable. Having notable clients does not make one notable. Notability does not automatically transfer. If it did, anyone could claim notability. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 06:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- The company is notable because it has been written about by reliable sources. There is no reason to characterize the article as spam. See the coverage at http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080529/NEWS01/805290317/1002 for example, which I added to a previous version of the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Allen_Group&oldid=219442646 (and then someone removed it). --Eastmain (talk) 07:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Just because one newspaper wrote about it doesn't automatically qualify it as notable. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 07:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- speedy is only if there is nothing to indicate importance, or where there is no practical way to rewrite the article to be descriptive rather than promotional. see WP:CSD. DGG (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Allen Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216164552/http://sourcebook.sddt.com:80/source/company.cfm?BusinessCategory_ID=93&Company_ID=4944 to http://sourcebook.sddt.com/Source/company.cfm?BusinessCategory_ID=93&Company_ID=4944
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)