Talk:The Altar and the Door/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 04:51, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Infobox

edit
  • Information in body of article needed to support the genre of the album
    • Changed to the body-supported 'Rock' and 'pop rock' genres.

Lead

edit

Background and recording

edit
  • No issues

Composition

edit
  • No issues

Critical reception and accolades

edit
  • No issues

Release and sales

edit
  • No issues

Singles

edit
  • No issues

Track listing

edit
  • No issues

Credits and personnel

edit
  • No issues

Charts and certifications

edit

References

edit
  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing both articles. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply