Talk:The Amanda Show
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
i think I know why this got cancelled
editA lot of parental groups complained about some skits being rasist. User:KinseyLOL
- Except that's not why. Bynes wanted to quit; it's pretty hard to have "The Amanda Show" without an "Amanda". CaptHayfever 19:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
i wish it didn't get cancelled, it was a great show, but she did quit to be on a show on wb called what i like about you. hotspot This is not a forum, all discussion here should be in regard to the actual article itself. Eatspie (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge it!
editNeeds to be merged.
just merge them
edit2 lines in both articles are redundant, and the other four can easily fit in the Amanda Show description, there is no need for another stub article
Template?
editI have added other Nickelodeon spin-off shows to the "See also" section. Do you think this might be the time for a template? Please reply. - LBM 21:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
You said I vandalized
editI added something to the "When ... Attack" section, and you said it was vandalism. I watched an episode with that in it the other day, and she said: "You may also know me as Bucky McBuckBuck, the worlds' most ticklish pony." I added the most ticklish pony part, and you said it was vandalism! Can you reconsider? That was one of the funniest moments on the show.
- Oops... it seems I made a mistake. I will re-add the line to the article. Once again, my sincere apologies! - LBM 01:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Crazy Joe Davola?!
editIn the info-box it says one of the executive producers is "Joe Davola"! This can't be true! It may be a coincidice, but I'm not sure. Steve 19:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps it's a different Joe Davola? Never Mystic (tc) 02:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Actually, to correct both of you, "Crazy" Joe was named after the producer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.223.240 (talk) 23:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Too much detail
editI think the "Recurring sketches" section should be trimmed; currently, it's very long. Never Mystic (tc) 19:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Totally Kyle
editThe description states that teens say "like" a lot. I think that is, like, somewhat biassed. - Redmess 11:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
:(
editi cant believe we never got to see who moody was...>:< Wikialexdx 15:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Copy editing this article
editHello. I am in the middle of copy editing this article, for the following reasons:
- An incredible amount of fancruft
- Poor ordering, sometimes using parts of the various sketches before they are introduced
- Too much information about individual sketches
- Several unnecessary sections, such as "Unseen Sketches"
- PGSONIC (talk) 23:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Done, though I may be editing further. - PGSONIC (talk) 00:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
The Amanda show ends?
editHey guys, do you know why The Amanda show ended? Did Nick cancel the show so they can do Drake&Josh?Veeboy (talk) 05:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Cliffhanger joke?
editIf I remember correctly, the last episode of the Amanda Show involved an episode of "Moody's Point" that ended in a "To Be Continued." Though the article says the show was cancelled shortly after the episode aired, might this have been a joke on the producers' part? Knowing this was the last episode, the producers might have intentionally ended the segment on a comically outrageous cliffhanger, with the story never to be resolved. Though if Moody's Point was a real show, it'd be tough to resolve a cliffhanger involving Moody returning to a family of trapeze artists. (And would Moody's mother ever come down from that renegade hot air balloon?) 24.60.88.170 (talk) 17:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Ask Ashley
editAsk Ashley was NOT a Amanda Show skit, It was infact, an All That skit.
Airing again?
editI've removed the following contentious text from the article:
- It now looks like it will start airing again on October 25, 2010.
{{Citation needed|date=June 2010}}
The problems are twofold: first, there is no source cited to back up the statement. Second, the "looks like" clause makes this read like original research.
WP:Verifiability requires that statements be attributable to a source; "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." Since no evidence to back up this alleged airdate has been provided, I have removed it as unverifiable. —C.Fred (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Recurring Sketches cut
editI think it's worth thinking about cutting the recurring sketches down significantly, perhaps to the top half dozen or dozen by frequency. Smith(talk) 22:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)