Talk:The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maclean25 (talk · contribs) 21:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Three images used: File:Archaeology of Ritual and Magic.jpg Fair use image of the book cover. File:Swinside (p4160146).jpg Commons-hosted cc-by-sa. File:Sator Square at Oppède.jpg Commons-hosted GNU cc-by-sa.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• I didn't realize until halfway through that I had already read this during its peer review. The article easily meets the GA criteria. If you would like a more detailed review or other perspectives, you can nominate this for Featured status. Otherwise, I look forward to seeing your next GA. maclean (talk) 04:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
  • As this is article about a book, I have placed it in the Literature section. maclean (talk) 04:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)