Talk:The Baldwin School
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notable alumni not notable
editIn general if a person isn't notable enough to have a WP article they are not notable enough to include in a list of notable alumni. The section needs a substantial trim. At the least sources are needed to establish notability for those without WP articles. - - MrBill3 (talk) 05:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Much unsourced content, and advert tone persists
editThanks to the editor who has improved the article. However there is still a substantial amount of content that is unsourced or primary sourced. The phrasing and tone still need improvement and the unduly excessive notable alumnae needs trimming to sourced notability. The article has not yet reached an encyclopedic style and tone. - - MrBill3 (talk) 15:49, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baldwin School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141206151338/http://gawker.com/5739887/new-york-times-names-new-op-ed-editor to http://gawker.com/5739887/new-york-times-names-new-op-ed-editor
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)