Talk:The Bandit Queen (film)
(Redirected from Talk:The Bandit Queen (1950 film))
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Nehrams2020 in topic WP:FILMS Assessment request
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Bandit Queen (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from The Bandit Queen (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 June 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hang on tag added
editThis article can be reworked to provide a Stub cat article. ----moreno oso (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Recommendations for improvement
edit- Center the quotes in the Reviews section (I didn't know to do that and want to use as citations in the lede).
- Submit article for possible upgrade to B status by WikiProject Film. ----moreno oso (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Assessment request
editA request was made to determine if the article meets the B-class criteria for WP:FILMS. The article needs additional expansion and for the below points to be addressed to be upgraded further.
- The Internet Movie Database is not a reliable source and should not be used to cite information. Look to other reliable sites, newspaper articles, journals, magazines, books, etc. that can source the same information.
- Try and develop the reception section more. Instead of just listing reviews, try and better develop them through prose. Look to current film GA/FAs for examples.
- This article needs to be expanded further to provide readers a more comprehensive look at the topic. Consider adding a production, box office, home media, accolades, or other related sections.
- The plot doesn't need to be cited as the film itself is the reference. Citations are only needed in the plot if it appears that interpretations are included.
Good work on the article so far, it's good to see that this was saved from deletion while also getting the DYK hook. Keep improving the article, it will have the potential to reach GA status and maybe further. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)