Talk:The Beauty Process: Triple Platinum
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Beauty Process: Triple Platinum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The Beauty Process: Triple Platinum has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:The Beauty Process.jpg
editImage:The Beauty Process.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Beauty Process: Triple Platinum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 14:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Infobox
edit- Genre?
- Use flatlist for studios.
Done
Lead
edit- Link Reprise Records
- Add the tour with Marlyn Manson
Done
Background and recording
edit- which was released by Slash Records in collaboration with Reprise Records, a major record label owned by the Warner Music Group. → source?
- "Sparks explained that spending time on the recording studio was very expensive and that the band could not afford to wait for Brinkman" → Sparks explained that there was a huge cost associated with the time spent in the recording studio, henceforth the band could not afford to wait for Brinkman (sounds better)
Done
Music and lyrics
edit- The track "Off the Wagon" → The single "Off the Wagon"
- Although the song promotes substance abuse → Although the track promotes substance abuse
Done
Promotion and release
edit- "The Beauty Process was released on February 25, 1997 by Slash Records." → missing source
- To promote the album, L7 signed on as an opening act on a Marilyn Manson tour across the US → year of the tour?
- on the US Billboard Top 200 chart and No. 12 on the Heatseekers Albums chart, → full stop
Done
Critical reception
edit- music critics → link to music journalism
- Stephen Thompson of The A.V. Club → The A.V. Club's Stephen Thompson
Done
Track listing
edit- All tracks written by Donita Sparks and Suzi Gardner. → use credits as it also proves the track listing
Done
Personnel
edit- Use
{{spaced ndash}}
instead of "-".
Done
References
edit- Don't link twice to the same page. See Spin, Billboard, AllMusic, MTV, Los Angeles Times, Rolling Stone
- According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking, "a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes [...] if helpful for readers" --Niwi3 (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Explain it to me how it helpful when you have 24 links? If you had 100... MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking, "a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes [...] if helpful for readers" --Niwi3 (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Remove the location from source 20 "New York"
- Vice is a magazine, not a publisher henceforth replace Noisey with vice.
- MTV source is missing it's author "MTV News Staff"
- Philadelphia Media Network (publisher) → The Philadelphia Inquirer (work)
- The previous link is dead
Done
External links
edit- Fine
Overall GA review
edit- Needs charts table and genre of the album.
- Added punk rock as the album's genre (as per reception section). Also, is it really necessary to add a table just for 2 US charts that are already mentioned in the promotion and release section? In my opinion, charts tables are only useful if the album in question has been commercially successful. --Niwi3 (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Where is that on the commercial section? Well, I have seen with one, some people maybe just looking for that and don't want to read a whoel section. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Few errors to amend and some other picky stuff from my part. It will be GA in no time, on hold for seven days, good luck! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review, really appreciated. I have addressed most of the issues you brought up and left two comments above. Let me know what you think! --Niwi3 (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed the remaining issues. Let me know if there is anything else that needs to be fixed. --Niwi3 (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC)