Talk:The Bees (English band)

Article title

The article title The Bees (UK band) should be changed to The Bees (British band). Eastpaw 2 Dec 06

Fair use rationale for Image:TheBees-Octopus.jpg

Image:TheBees-Octopus.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:TheBeeslogo.png

Image:TheBeeslogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sunshine hit me.png

Image:Sunshine hit me.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Thebeesuk.png

Image:Thebeesuk.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Bees (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070715005815/http://www.videology-tv.com/viewclip.php?id=76 to http://www.videology-tv.com/viewclip.php?id=76

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Bees (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.thedrum.co.uk/news/2011/06/29/22929-karmarama-creates-tv-campaign-for-age-uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130722170854/http://2am.co.uk/article/home/becky-martin-age-uk/1625 to http://www.2am.co.uk/article/home/becky-martin-age-uk/1625

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Balzouki?

Under the section Members, it says "Chris Stankovich - 7-string electric balzouki". I can't find any musical instrument online called "Balzouki". Could this be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouzouki ??

Requested move 17 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

---

The Bees (band) → The Bees (English band) – Not convinced this is sufficiently primary over the three other bands in the hatnote to warrant partial disambiguation. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 05:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The Bees (band) averages 59 views per day while the only other article that would use the title, The Bees (American band), gets only 2 views per day.[1] The hatnote is sufficient. Station1 (talk) 08:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

  And what about the other two bands mentioned there? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

  They are linked from the hatnote. That's more than enough, since almost nobody is ever going to search for those two as "The Bees", much less "The Bees (band)", Station1 (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Incomplete disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
• Support I don't think the ratios are enough for a PDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
• Support: Considering that three different bands with this name are discussed on Wikipedia (not counting the Japanese band) and none of them seem like major chart-toppers, I don't see a good case to retain a PDAB situation. WP:RECENTISM may also be a big factor here, since the English band has been active recently and the American band hasn't been active for about 60 years. In fact, the article about the American band also discusses a fifth band with the same name. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.