Talk:The Beginning (The X-Files)

Aspect ratio

This is the first episode to use wide screen format, at least as downloaded from itunes. Does anybody have any background information on this, since widescreen television sets weren't even a blip on the radar in 1998? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.198.222 (talk) 21:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

(answer a year later) Probably just an artistic decision; maybe wanted to "feel" more like the movie, since that was what had just preceded this episode in the storyline. --LarryJeff (talk) 17:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Beginning (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 15:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 15:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

• No need for the Vancouver link (see WP:OVERLINK). Same for Los Angeles, California, United States, United Kingdom, and Ireland
• Why the quotes when mentioned the feature film?
• it's -> it is; doesn't -> does not (don't use contractions)
• Who is The Black-Haired Man? Is there a relevent wikilink for him? Add the actor's name?
• Indeed, the very first shot of the episode—a long look into the sun was—intended by Carter to "boldly announce the show's arrival in Southern California." -?> Indeed, the very first shot of the episode—a long look into the sun—was intended by Carter to "boldly announce the show's arrival in Southern California.
• new co-Executive Producer -> new co-executive producer
• Wikilink David Duvhovny in pre-production section
• Make sure the first mention of Spotnitz includes his name and a wikilink in production section
• the writers sought... the writers sought (needs switching up)
• No need to say Carter is the series creator twice; also avoid wikilinking him more than once in the article body
• Wikilink to Southern California Edison
• The episode was the second highest rated episode of the sixth season Removed bolded (or input "The Beginning")
• "The episode received mixed-to-negative reviews from critics, ranging from largely positive to negative". I think this statement could be written differently. Maybe "Critical reception to the episode was divided, as reviews ranged from largely positive to negative"
• Remove that X-Files link in reception section (I think it's already linked plenty above!)

I'll place the review on hold for seven days. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 22:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

OK, I believe I've addresses all the concerns. Thanks a ton for reviewing this article!--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Made some of the unresolved edits myself. Looks good, passing for GA. Nice work, Ruby 2010/2013 20:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Beginning (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://space.com/sciencefiction/tv/ailing_xfiles_000120.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)