This article was nominated for deletion on December 7 2014. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am asking for this article to be undeleted as I believe the subject now meets Wikipedia:Notability criteria. I note the recent controversy, covered by both the Sydney Morning Herald and ABC, where John Eales felt it necessary to respond publicly to a satirical Betoota Advocate piece. In the SMH article quoted, journalist Peter FitzSimons describes it as a 'popular satirical website.' Elitism (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)