Talk:The Big Nowhere

non-neutral POV

this sounds like a press release, especially as you get towards the bottom. Mercmisfire 00:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I think it sounds more like a review which I don't think is that out of place here. Andydepressant (talk) 05:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it sounds more like a review. But that *is* out of place here. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia article. As such, mention and citation of *published* reviews would be appropriate; some Wiki-editor using Wikipedia as a forum to disseminate his/her *own* review (which seems to be what we have here) is not. WP:NOR 64.124.27.3 (talk) 00:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

I added references to two published reviews. I could not locate citations to the other reviews mentioned. They sound like they might come from the book jacket. Phb256 (talk) 16:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)