Talk:The Big One (Dexter)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Fayenatic london in topic Through a Glass Darkly
![]() | A fact from The Big One (Dexter) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Link to dab page
editI am not sure how linking to a dab page is to give an idea of popularity, or why such an idea is needed in this link. If the read needs an idea of popularity, the idea should be presented in the text here (with citation for its notability), not suggested by the contents of a navigational page somewhere else. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Discussion can be found here. Your input would be most welcome. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- My input is above. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- What I meant was your input about the idea of copyediting the dab page and renaming it to List of works named "Through a Glass, Darkly". Hearfourmewesique (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have to say that isn't going to work. The Dab page serves an important function, and needs to be there. Its function would not be eclipsed by a "List of" article. They could exist separately. The Interior(Talk) 20:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- What I meant was your input about the idea of copyediting the dab page and renaming it to List of works named "Through a Glass, Darkly". Hearfourmewesique (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- My input is above. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Agree, linking to a dab page should not be done unless it's in a hat-note. Even if there would be an article "List of works named "Through a Glass, Darkly"", which would not be a replacement of the dab article, I don't believe there is a need for a link towards it. Why the need to show unrelated materials which just happen to have the same name, in this case just a working title, not even the actual title? Xeworlebi (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Through a Glass Darkly
editSomeone who cares should mention the fan name "Through a Glass Darkly" with a citation; otherwise, the link to this page should be removed from Through a Glass Darkly. – Fayenatic London 18:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)