Talk:The Blond Knight of Germany

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Military history: Historiography

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force

I think it would be helpful if the information on historians' criticisms of this book went into a little more detail. Do historians claim that the book actually presents an inaccurate depiction of Hartmann himself? As written it sounds like they do not, but only take issue with the book's presentation of the broader social context of World War II. But the writing in this article is vague enough that I cannot tell if this is what is meant or not. In particular, referring to a book about a specific individual as "ahistorical and misleading" seems a little misleading itself if the problem with the book's history isn't it's presentation of the individual it's about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.117.105 (talk) 20:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic