Talk:The Book of Daniel (TV series)

Fair use rationale for Image:BookOfDaniel2006.jpg

Image:BookOfDaniel2006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Daniel01.jpg

Image:Daniel01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Book of Daniel (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060220142411/http://www.mercurynews.com:80/mld/mercurynews/entertainment/13702858.htm to http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/entertainment/13702858.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Controversy over what exactly?

There's a big section here about the show being the subject of controversy and viewer complaints, but as a person casually reading, it's impossible to discern what it was that people were complaining about. I can make a guess that maybe it was the gay character, or an on-screen jesus questioning modern bible interpretations, but these are only guesses, because the article does not clarify this at all. I have never seen the show and only stumbled upon this article because I saw Zoom and was curious to see more things with Alison Pill in them, but someone needs to fix that controversy section because after reading it several times over I still can only guess about what it was that offended people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.251.175.176 (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

well, it does seem like some sort of soap opera pushing just about every negative stereotype one can imagine - drug addict minister, alcoholic minister's wife, gay minister's son, Christian's being racists, etc., etc., etc. frankly never heard of this program and can see why - only a hatemongering hypocrite could want to see it to reinforce their own prejudices against Christians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:300:A9E0:A52F:E332:2B4:1A32 (talk) 08:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)