Talk:The Book of Giants
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Book of Giants article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ogias the Giant or Book of Giants
editThis article is titled Ogias the Giant but in my humble opinion it should be called The Book of Giants (and have Ogias the Giant be a redirect), since the name of the original text (4Q203, 1Q23, 2Q26, 4Q530-532, 6Q8) is The Book of Giants in all reference literature, starting from Josef T. Milik (with Matthew Black), The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4, Oxford: Clarendon, 1976. In addition, Ogias is probably a non-standard transliteration: I think it would be better Ohya, and in any case the Qumran fragments do not refer to Ogias/Ohya in a particular way, but at least to two others Giants (Hahya and Mahway) as well. --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Accepted. However Ogias exists, it refers to a separate related book. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Spelling of "Mahway"
editI came here looking for the spelling of "Mahway" and found it listed in the article in two different spellings under the same section. Obviously we are talking about a translated name- could go either way, but is there a concensus for Mahway? Wcichello (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Accuracy concerns
editThis article was heavily edited by User:Chauvelin2000 between March and August 2019. A lot of the content added by Chauvelin has now been removed, by myself and others, but a lot remains. This editor has previously been accused of pushing an Latter-Day Saint POV (and their additions to this article included a lengthy section on the Book of Moses), and concerns have been raised about their use of sources (see eg. this discussion). Given this, I think the sources cited in this article need to be checked to confirm that they support the content. I don't have access to any of them myself, unfortunately, so... just leaving this note. Dan from A.P. (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)