Talk:The Bounds of Sense
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article about Nothing
editThis article provides no information. However, it does further the pompous point of view that there is little contemporary value in Kant's writings. This is typical of post-MTV thought. No intelligence. I will try to add something to the article in an attempt to rescue it from its present worthlessness.69.19.14.26 23:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Lestrade
Lead
editRecent edits to the lead make it state that The Bounds of Sense "received praise from philosophers as one of the first thorough works on the Critique of Pure Reason". The addition itself may be perfectly correct. The body of the article does not support it, however. None of the commentary on the book in the "Reception" section praises The Bounds of Sense specifically for its thoroughness. I suggest that if the "thoroughness" reference in the lead is to be kept, then supporting material should be added to the "Reception" section. Also, in case it is not clear, the manual of style reference I was trying to refer to here is WP:PEACOCK. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 01:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)