Talk:The British Invasion (Dexter)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Very nice work with this article. I have very few comments and they won't take very long at all to address.

Lead

• "...because the character was "too good to not kill"." Even if this is sourced later in the body of the article, you still have to have an inline citation here since its a direct quote fragment.
• "It was nominated for an Emmy Award and a Golden Reel Award." I'd suggest you mention which specific awards here...

Plot

• Maybe this is just personal preference on my part, but I feel anything wikilinked in the lead already should be also wikilinked again on the first reference within the body of the article. I didn't make any changes to this article because I wanted to hear whether you objected to it first?

I'll place it on hold for now. — Hunter Kahn 16:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

I think I've addressed your concerns. Thanks a lot for the review - it's brave of you to try and tackle the GAN backlog! I'd offer to help out, but I just don't have the time to do anything anymore. Thanks again, —97198 (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

GA Checklist

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Well done! That's a pass! — Hunter Kahn 14:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! —97198 (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)