Talk:The Bulletin (alternative weekly)

1.) there is a mark williams I have met with in person to interview him about an article he wrote as I was writing a followup article he had written.

2) There is a mike ladyman as I have met with him as we were bartering web servers for advertising in his paper.

And mark and mike are two different people.

You people don't understand the prospect of entrusting people to perform the work they were hired for and not micromanaging them. Mr Ladyman was not aware of the plagerisim or he would of never permitted it to cause damage to his newspaper he ran for over a decade.

Most articles I see talking about the demise of "the bulletin" always toss in the fact that "The Bulletin" was some wacky left wing rag/paper and it makes me wonder if it is really about the plagerism or is it a way to try and shut down an open minded paper that has controversial articles.

I believe the accusations that mike ladyman created the identity of mark williams as a ghost writer should be considered liable and slanderious and done in a malicious manner to cause damages to the name and reputation of "The Bulletin"

The Bulletin is not dead just making some changes.

Shawn Brockup 74.195.224.52 (talk) 18:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

• So far it has not returned. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

The Bulletin and plagiarism

I found a Houston Chronicle article about plagiarism from Montgomery County Bulletin in Montgomery County.

• Cook, Allison. "Barbecue & plagiarism at Montgomery County's Bulletin." Houston Chronicle. August 6, 2008.

The Houston Press also posted one about it here: Connelly, Richard. "R.I.P., Plagiarizing Montgomery County Paper." Houston Press. Friday August 8, 2008. And this too: Vogel, Chris. "Montgomery County -- Home To The Greatest Journalistic Scandal Ever?" Houston Press. August 6, 2008.

WhisperToMe (talk) 02:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)