Talk:The Calculus of Consent
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of The Calculus of Consent be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editThis is an excellent outline of the book. But I'm seeing red -- too much. No criticism of what's there, which is fine. But possibly the key ideas of key chapters could be expanded on (not necessarily in chapter form). A fuller exposition might tempt more readers to visit the original.
BW, Thomasmeeks 16:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Its an old article of mine that needs copyedit and expansion. Some redlinks possibly can be redirected to existing article. As most wiki, it is a job in progress - when somebody will want to improve it, they will. Thanks for the comments!--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nifty moniker. Expanded Categories for more attention. Thomasmeeks 16:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Hyperlinks
editThe hyperlinks in the chapter titles are misleading. For example "The Bicameral Legislature" does not, as it would seem, lead to a summary of the chapter, but a general page on bicameral legislatures (where Buchanan is not mentioned). This is true for a number of the links from the chapter titles. To make it less misleading, perhaps just "Bicameral Legislature" should be the hyperlink, rather than including the article. May seem trivial, but perhaps it would help avoid confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.9.130 (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)</span Vacalder91 (talk) 18:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC)