Talk:The Canterbury Academy

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

WHY DID YOU REMOVE THAT COMMENT THAT I PUT ON THERE BECAUSE IT IS TRUE??? CHSIS (talk) 10:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Simple answer. Wikipedia is an *encyclopedia*, intended to give impartial and objective information. It is not the place for personal opinions. Think what the page would look like if lots of previous students decided to give their views as well. Eebkent (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
CHSIS, you might want to take a look at WP:RS and WP:V - they explain why Wikipedia doesn't deal in random opinions, in theory everything you add should be verifiable by a reliable third-party source. Random opinions like yours are generally not verifiable, but if you can find a reliable third-party source for your statements then feel free to include them. Subject of course to the need to maintain a neutral point of view of course.82.2.128.157 (talk) 16:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Canterbury Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply