Talk:The Carillon (Regina)

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OCLC

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Perhaps some kind of adjustment is needed to the newspaper infobox. I am not certain that all valid newspapers have an ISSN. The OCLC for The Carillon is OCLC 17513456. Keesiewonder ^talk 20:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, not all newspapers have an ISSN. However, practically all major newspapers (and other periodicals) do. —Psychonaut 21:36, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

"oclc = " has been added to the infobox template to cater for this. John Vandenberg 22:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Excellent; thank you both! Keesiewonder ^talk 22:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quality

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is the quality of this article any indication of the quality of the newspaper itself? Someone who actually cares about this newspaper should rewrite this, and if no such person exists, the article should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.183.28 (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic