Talk:The Carpet from Bagdad/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Khazar2 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 17:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'll be glad to take this one; thanks in advance for your work on it. -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This looks good on a first pass. There's understandably little content, this being a mostly lost film, and a bit of Googling of my own didn't turn up any useful new sources. Let me go through the checklist, but this may already be ready to pass. -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Checklist

edit
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Spotchecks show no evidence of copyright issues.
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. The lead could perhaps use another sentence about the production information, but it at least touches on this section by mentioning the book as source.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
  2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall assessment. Pass--very nice work