Talk:The Cats of Ulthar

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Canadian Paul in topic GA Review
Good articleThe Cats of Ulthar has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2011Good article nomineeListed

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Cats of Ulthar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


It is unfortunate that there are no images for this article. I have found a few images on internet search engines that may be appropriate if permission can be granted for their fair use. Please read copy right permission and fair use rationales, and see if an appropriate image for this article can be obtained. While I do not believe it is a requirement for all GAs to have images, and it would be better for an article to have no image rather than have an inappropriate one, I would like to see if an appropriate image could be found. I will place the review of this article on hold for a week or so until there is a response from the article nominator or someone else who is concerned with this article. --Tea with toast (talk) 20:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, thanks for the review! In my absence, someone has posted a relevant free image but, if it would help, there are several images out there that could be suitable under Template:Non-free book cover. Would it help the article further to add a book cover? Canadian Paul 05:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I think it would improve the article to have a lead image. Thanks. --Tea with toast (talk) 00:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Done - to the best of my knowledge, this is the only printing with the title of the story on the cover... unless it was on the cover of the November 1920 Tryout printing, the cover of which I could not find on the internet. Canadian Paul 01:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Great job! --Tea with toast (talk) 02:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again for the review! Canadian Paul 03:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply