Talk:The Christadelphian

File:TheChristadelphian.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:TheChristadelphian.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 May 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:TheChristadelphian.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Embezzlement

I think it would be fair to say that the replacement of (redacted as no criminal conviction to the best of my knowledge) the former editor, with respect to embezzlement, is a significant incident for the Christadelphians magazine. Some time ago his name was removed from this article, but when restored it was subsequently left. Although some small explanation would be appropriate I suspect it would be removed to seek to uphold Christadelphian sensitivites. I know in Wikipedia current editors ultimately determine what gets left unless you know the rules and know how to play the Wikipedia game. So I'm just leaving this here as a thought and as a suggestion to those who do edit and maintain the posting. I have some basic details on my own website here, http://www.christadelphianresearch.com/investigationforfraud.htm, although it wouldn't need to be that involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.178.11 (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

The article is about the magazine, not its editors. A separate, biographical Wikipedia entry for Ashton would make more sense. Otherwise you'll have to list all the editors of the Christadelphian magazine in this article for the sake of consistency. Incidentally, if you are interested in documenting cases of illegality within the Christadelphian community, you may wish to consider two Christadelphians recently convicted of multi-million dollar fraud via an illegal Ponzi scheme: Samuel Pogson and Murray Lapham. Media covered was quite detailed (here and here).Sankari Suomi (talk) 14:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)