Talk:The Clod and the Pebble

Analysis

There really should be an analysis of the poem. This need further developing and this is just a thought:

It links the the images of lovers with manipulative characteristics. The "Clod" is a selfless symbol that gives love to others, but suffers a inner-turmoil where it is manipulated; the "Pebble" is a selfish symbol that attempts show love to others, but as a result manipulates others and "bind[s] another to its delight".

The depictions of these two symbols representing lovers is signified by the diptych structure, where the first stanza is denotes a altruistic character, shown by "Love seeker not itself to please". Conversely, the third stanza is constructive towards a narcissistic character, shown by "Love seeketh only itself to please".

(Lord Shivan (talk) 20:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC))

Sadly comments above would surely constitute original research? 82.16.99.131 (talk) 12:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Clod and the Pebble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080301232637/http://www.english.uga.edu:80/wblake/SONGS/32/32biblio.html to http://www.english.uga.edu/wblake/SONGS/32/32biblio.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)