Talk:The Club (video game)

Promoting Xbox360

Is it ok to use The Club Xbox360 version cover to promote Xbox360 on wikipedia? I don't think so. Espesially when this product is available on other platforms such as Windows and Playstation 3. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dekonegawa (talk • contribs) 17:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

The article all togheter needs an update, its written way to much like an advertisement.

   -Yoeri  10:50, 9 July 2008

Agreed with the above, this article is biased. The game received very mediocre reviews on PC and Playstation 3 as well as from players on all three platforms. The article is possibly the writing of someone who wants the game to seem better received than it was or an Xbox 360 gamer who didn't pay attention to the other systems. 81.100.246.84 (talk) 15:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Character Endings

I'm planning to write the story endings for all playable characters. Do I have permission?

Najhoant (talk) 22:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

More Detail

This Article needs more detail. Received positive or mediocre, The Club IS a very unique game. And to show this, there should be more detail about the Gameplay: Score mechanics: hit zone, distance, combo, awards (snap shot, death roll, ric-o-slay). Game modes in Singleplayer and Multiplayer. Types of arms (OK, there is nothing special about them, but even that is an info). Story: The playable characters (their background, nationality, stats), the enemies (Basically one for each weapon class, Sniper, Bazooka, Gatling, Fixed Turret and Bonus Enemy!), info about the club members and the secretary. And the locations. It doesn't need a list of everything. But one or two sentences about what makes each category different from other games. Opinions anybody?--TeakHoken91.47.74.223 (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Club (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gameinformer.com/NR/exeres/BE39F6EF-247A-41E4-93F3-37118B0A46B7.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamepro.com/article/reviews/163368/show-some-love-for-the-club/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)