Talk:The Collection (30 Rock)/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by ThinkBlue in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Well done.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is the External links section supposed to be blanked? Also, you might want to find [fix] Reference 3, since registration is required.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- The infobox, now I believe "Jack" is not "Jenna" nor "Kenneth", so you might want to fix the caption there.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- The infobox, now I believe "Jack" is not "Jenna" nor "Kenneth", so you might want to fix the caption there.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. :) I fixed the caption; Jamie changed the image just before the review, I believe, and forgot to change the caption. I added two external links, and added a note on the ref that registration is required. Is that okay? Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 07:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, I was glad to see another 30 Rock article up at GAN. Nice, I saw the image of Jenna and Kenneth and then the image changed to Jack holding jars, which puzzled me a bit. Its fine, a heads-up in the source works. Thank you to Cornucopia and Jamie for getting the stuff I left at the talkpage, cause I have gone off and passed the article to GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)