This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm not saying that the reviews of the book weren't mixed, but a (poorly-formatted) link to the book's page at Amazon is not the way to show that; similarly, while I'm sure the book's plot is heavily fictionalized, an uncited statement about Philippa Gregory's other work is not evidence of the inaccuracy of this particular book. A well-written and well-referenced section about the book's critical reviews, or its deviation from established fact, would certainly be a welcome enhancement to the article. Propaniac (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}