Talk:The Conversation (Mad About You)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Conversation (Mad About You)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 23:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• This article's infobox has some parameters that can be filled in, such as the episode's producers (Craig Knizek, William Cosentino, and Mike Martineau), cinematographer (Bobby Byrne), and editor (Sheila Amos). Information can be found here.
• Second sentence in the lead ends too soon. Try merging it with the next one.

Plot

• Since there's no cast section, episode articles usually have the actors' names in this section.
• This section is 294 words long, so there are no problems with MOS:TVPLOT.
• Add a comma after "he is shrinking".
  •  Done

Production

Conception and writing

• "Victor Levin wrote the script. He believed" --> "Victor Levin wrote the script, believing that"
• "and Helen Hunt's talents. He also hoped" --> "and Helen Hunt's talents, also hoping that"
• "something show personnel" --> "something the show's personnel"
• "They were unable" --> "However, they were unable"
  •  Done

Filming and broadcast

• Cinematographer Bobby Byrne should probably be mentioned in this section.
• Other than that, I couldn't find any other issues here.
  • My problem with this is that Byrne isn't mentioned in any of the sources, so his work on this episode doesn't appear to be notable enough. - JuneGloom07 Talk 04:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Reception

Ratings

• This reference doesn't say that the episode "was the seventh most-watched show on NBC".
  • True, but I assumed the reader would be able to deduce that fact from the figures given. I don't think that violates WP:OR. - JuneGloom07 Talk 04:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Critical response

• New section, so the names Paul Reiser and Helen Hunt should be in full.
• Put quotation marks around the word "special".
  •  Done

Other stuff

• Per criteria #6, some images should probably be added, such as a television screenshot, or an image of a notable actor.
  • Added images of the actors involved. - JuneGloom07 Talk 04:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Overview

GAN table

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Notes

• @JuneGloom07: This article is in great shape but could use some small adjustments. I have just finished adding most, if not all of my notes for this review, so feel free to add comments and message me back. I hope I can promote this article to GA-status really soon. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 02:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the review. I will get through these later today. - JuneGloom07 Talk 04:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)